Book · Editorial review
Trend Following (Updated Edition)
An introduction to systematic trading ideas that is best read as a study of rules and risk, with strong skepticism toward promises of reliable profit.
A source-based editorial guide. Read the sources and review basis.
The investment idea
Michael Covel describes traders who respond to price trends through systematic rules rather than trying to predict every market turning point. The publisher highlights trader profiles and historical performance as part of the book's case for the approach. The collection contains an updated edition; publication details vary across versions. [1]
What a careful reader can learn
The useful educational themes are consistency, explicit rules and attention to how losses are handled. A rule that can be written down is easier to examine than an intuition defended only after an outcome is known. The same discipline can improve many decisions outside trading.
The marketing language deserves a firm challenge. Historical winners do not establish that a reader can reproduce their results. Costs, leverage, drawdowns, taxes and the difficulty of following a strategy through losses matter. A backtest can also be shaped by choices made after seeing the data. Profiting in some rising and falling markets is not the same as profiting in every market.
This is a specialized choice for readers studying market strategies and their assumptions. It is not an introductory household budgeting guide or a reason to place essential savings at risk. Treat the stories as material for analysis, not as a forecast of personal returns.
A seven-day paper exercise
Without placing trades, write down the entry, exit and loss limits of one strategy described in a source you can inspect. Identify its assumptions and the costs a real user would face. Record what information is missing before evaluating any results.
Use public historical examples and a notebook or spreadsheet. The benefit is a clearer risk explanation, not simulated profit. If discussing the exercise with others, include losing scenarios and avoid presenting it as an investment recommendation.
Discuss: What evidence would persuade you that a winning story is not a reliable strategy?
Sources and review basis
Publisher or author description, with original editorial analysis and a suggested practical experiment. The full book was not supplied.
The practical experiment and discussion questions are Môle FM editorial suggestions. The source links help you examine the book and the claims for yourself.